Category — Politics
Visionary Prasad Yadav
If ‘Lalu Yadav is a visionary‘, then I am Santa Claus!!
February 3, 2005 No Comments
Overseas minister for Indians?!
Jagdish Tytler, a minister in charge of a pretty superfluous ministry (he’s the minister for overseas Indians) says, in an interview to rediff.com, that his ministry will listen to Indians abroad.
By all means! … But I’d much rather prefer it if his government listens to Indians within the country first… instead of turning its ears only towards the Left!
And I couldn’t help but chuckle when the minister was asked which countries he had covered in his extensive foreign jaunts and he started off by mentioning Brussels!! :-P
December 6, 2004 No Comments
Privacy? … What’s that?!
Sucheta Dalal alerts us to the Government’s silent intrusion into the privacy of honest tax-paying citizens.
The average honest tax payer, especially the non-salaried class would have ordinarily welcomed this effort to flush out chronic tax evaders, except that the rot in the regulatory and enforcement machinery is deep that these measures are viewed with extreme cynicism and even anger.
Each of these actions only allow government agencies to intrude a little more into the lives or ordinary citizens. Confidential information about their assets and spending habits will now filter through porous government departments from a variety of different sources.
Time to sit up and take notice!!
December 6, 2004 No Comments
Economic Hit Men
John Perkins is an ‘Economic Hit Man’. His job is simple (well, not really). When the US faces any economic threat, he is called upon to do a job that’s the financial equivalent of carrying out a ‘hit’ on whoever or whatever threatens the economy. In his own words, “It’s almost James Bondish…”
John Perkins has written a book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man in which he talks about how his job involved cheating poorer countries out of trillions of dollars in turn helping build up the American economy. I just came across his interview via a post on Metafilter.
Perkins says in his interview…
Basically what we were trained to do and what our job is to do is to build up the American empire. To bring — to create situations where as many resources as possible flow into this country, to our corporations, and our government, and in fact we’ve been very successful. We’ve built the largest empire in the history of the world. It’s been done over the last 50 years since World War II with very little military might, actually. It’s only in rare instances like Iraq where the military comes in as a last resort. This empire, unlike any other in the history of the world, has been built primarily through economic manipulation, through cheating, through fraud, through seducing people into our way of life, through the economic hit men. I was very much a part of that.
As blunt as it gets, isn’t it?! It gets better still…
Well, the company I worked for was a company named Chas. T. Main in Boston, Massachusetts. We were about 2,000 employees, and I became its chief economist. I ended up having fifty people working for me. But my real job was deal-making. It was giving loans to other countries, huge loans, much bigger than they could possibly repay. One of the conditions of the loan–let’s say a $1 billion to a country like Indonesia or Ecuador–and this country would then have to give ninety percent of that loan back to a U.S. company, or U.S. companies, to build the infrastructure–a Halliburton or a Bechtel. These were big ones. Those companies would then go in and build an electrical system or ports or highways, and these would basically serve just a few of the very wealthiest families in those countries. The poor people in those countries would be stuck ultimately with this amazing debt that they couldn’t possibly repay. A country today like Ecuador owes over fifty percent of its national budget just to pay down its debt. And it really can’t do it. So, we literally have them over a barrel.
Later in the interview Perkins discloses why US invaded Iraq…
We knew Saudi Arabia was the key to dropping our dependency, or to controlling the situation. And we worked out this deal whereby the Royal House of Saud agreed to send most of their petro-dollars back to the United States and invest them in U.S. government securities. The Treasury Department would use the interest from these securities to hire U.S. companies to build Saudi Arabia–new cities, new infrastructure–which we’ve done. And the House of Saud would agree to maintain the price of oil within acceptable limits to us, which they’ve done all of these years, and we would agree to keep the House of Saud in power as long as they did this, which we’ve done, which is one of the reasons we went to war with Iraq in the first place. And in Iraq we tried to implement the same policy that was so successful in Saudi Arabia, but Saddam Hussein didn’t buy. When the economic hit men fail in this scenario, the next step is what we call the jackals. Jackals are C.I.A.-sanctioned people that come in and try to foment a coup or revolution. If that doesn’t work, they perform assassinations. or try to. In the case of Iraq, they weren’t able to get through to Saddam Hussein. He had — His bodyguards were too good. He had doubles. They couldn’t get through to him. So the third line of defense, if the economic hit men and the jackals fail, the next line of defense is our young men and women, who are sent in to die and kill, which is what we’ve obviously done in Iraq.
Hmmm… interesting! … So it WAS oil after all!! ;-)
Check out the rest of the interview… Perkins talks about how a Panamian president was assasinated after he sorta double-crossed one US corporation. It’s very Michael Mooresque! (which actually isn’t saying much!) :-P
November 10, 2004 2 Comments
Up or down?
Earlier, it used to be the Pakistanis who used to claim that the infiltration levels had gone down while the Indian Government used to refute it by saying that the levels were still quite high. The usual diplomatic wranglings!
But now, it’s the Indian Government itself which claims that the Pakistani infiltration has gone down following the fencing along the border. Interestingly, however, the Indian Army is refuting this claim and saying that, in fact, Pakistan has stepped up its efforts to push terrorists into Jammu & Kashmir.
November 7, 2004 1 Comment
